Therapiekonzepte 2021 – der zahnlose Oberkiefer

Unsere Patienten werden immer älter. Mit welcher Art des Zahnersatzes werden wir den Patienten mit zahnlosem Oberkiefer gerecht? Die Wahl des ZE hängt auch von den Änderungs- und Reinigungsmöglichkeiten ab. Hier erhalten Sie unter anderem Hilfestellung für die richtige Entscheidung zwischen festsitzend und herausnehmbar.

Autoren-Infos, Literaturhinweise
und Sonstiges zu diesem Artikel in Heft 3/4-2020:

Von

Prof. Hahnel und Dr. Weber

Vitas

Sophia Weber, Dr. med. dent.

– 2009–2014 Studium der Zahnmedizin an der Universität Leipzig

– 2015–2017 Assistenzzahn- ärztin sowie angestellte Zahnärztin in Privatpraxen

– Seit Januar 2018 wissenschaftliche Zahnärztin an der Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde am Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

– 2020 Promotion

Sebastian Hahnel, Prof. Dr. med. dent.

-2001–2006 Studium der Zahnmedizin an der Universität Regensburg

-2007 Promotion

– 2007–2011 wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter an der Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg

-2011 Habilitation und Ernennung zum qualifiziert fortgebildeten Spezialisten für Prothetik (DGPro)

-2011–2018 Oberarzt an der Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg

-Seit 2018 Direktor der Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde am Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

Literatur

1. Destatis Statistisches Bundesamt. Bevölkerung – Demografische Aspekte. 2020; Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Querschnitt/Demografischer-Wandel/textbaustein-taser-blau-bevoelkerungszahl.html.

2. Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung. Bevölkerung nach Altersgruppen (1871-2060). 2020 [cited 2020 December 22]; Available from: https://www.bib.bund.de/Permalink.html?id=10208970.

3. Nitschke, I. and H. Stark, Krankheits- und Versorgungsprävalenzen bei Jüngeren Senioren (65- bis 74-Jährige): Zahnverlust und prothetische Versorgung., in Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie, R. Jordan and W. Micheelis, Editors. 2016, Deutscher Zahnärzte Verlag: Köln. p. 416-451.

4. Schwendicke, F., et al., Epidemiological trends, predictive factors, and projection of tooth loss in Germany 1997-2030: part II. Edentulism in seniors. Clin Oral Investig, 2020. 24(11): p. 3997-4003.

5. Nitschke, I. and H. Stark, Krankheits- und Versorgungsprävalenzen bei Älteren Senioren (75- bis 100-Jährige): Zahnverlust und prothetische Versorgung., in Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie, R. Jordan and W. Micheelis, Editors. 2016, Deutscher Zahnärzte Verlag: Köln. p. 517-548.

6. Kassenzahnärztliche Bundesvereinigung. Festzuschüsse für Zahnersatz. 2020 [cited 2020 January 5]; Available from: https://www.kzbv.de/fz-rl-2020-09-03-ik-2020-10-01.download.46aebd23e2a324396f115494dc65c829.pdf.

7. Thalji, G., K. McGraw, and L.F. Cooper, Maxillary Complete Denture Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Patient-Based Outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016. 31 Suppl: p. s169-81.

8. Albaker, A.M., The oral health-related quality of life in edentulous patients treated with conventional complete dentures. Gerodontology, 2013. 30(1): p. 61-6.

9. Sadowsky, S.J. and N.U. Zitzmann, Protocols for the Maxillary Implant Overdenture: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016. 31 Suppl: p. s182-91.

10. Fernandez-Estevan, L., et al., Oral health-related quality of life of implant-supported overdentures versus conventional complete prostheses: Retrospective study of a cohort of edentulous patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2015. 20(4): p. e450-8.

11. Awad, M.A., et al., Implant overdentures and nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res, 2012. 91(1): p. 39-46.

12. Hamdan, N.M., et al., Do implant overdentures improve dietary intake? A randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res, 2013. 92(12 Suppl): p. 146S-53S.

13. DGI, D., AWMF,. Implantatprothetische Versorgung des zahnlosen Oberkiefers. 2020 [cited 2020 January 5]; Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/083-010l_S3_Implantatprothetische-Versorgung_zahnloser-Oberkiefer_2017-03_abgelaufen.pdf.

14. AWMF online. Implantatprothetische Versorgung des zahnlosen Oberkiefers. [cited 2020 January 11]; Available from: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/083-010.html.

15. Mumcu, E., et al., Comparison of four-implant-retained overdentures and implant-supported fixed prostheses using the All-on-4 concept in the maxilla in terms of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and marginal bone loss: a 2-year retrospective study. Quintessence Int, 2020. 51(5): p. 388-396.

16. Feine, J.S., et al., Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: choice of prosthesis. J Dent Res, 1994. 73(5): p. 1105-11.

17. Weber, S., I. Nitschke, and S. Hahnel, Prothetische Therapiewege in der Seniorenzahnmedizin. Zahnmedizin up2date, 2020. 14(3): p. 1-14.

18. de Grandmont, P., et al., Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res, 1994. 73(5): p. 1096-104.

19. Takahashi, T., T. Gonda, and Y. Maeda, Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 1. Overdenture with Palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017. 32(6): p. 1308-1314.

20. Passia, N. and M. Kern, Erforderliche Anzahl von Implantaten für eine abnehmbare Versorgung im zahnlosen Kiefer. wissen kompakt, 2020. 14(4): p. 155-162.

21. Di Francesco, F., et al., The number of implants required to support a maxillary overdenture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont Res, 2019. 63(1): p. 15-24.

22. Schwarz, F., et al., Loading protocols and implant supported restorations proposed for the rehabilitation of partially and fully edentulous jaws. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016. 27(8): p. 988-92.

23. Takahashi, T., T. Gonda, and Y. Maeda, Effect of Attachment Type on Denture Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Part 1. Overdenture with Palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017. 32(4): p. 815-821.

24. Takahashi, T., et al., Effect of Attachment Type on Implant Strain in Maxillary Implant Overdentures: Comparison of Ball, Locator, and Magnet Attachments. Part 2: Palateless Dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018. 33(2): p. 357-364.

25. Wolfart, S., Implantatprothetik – Ein Patientenorientiertes Konzept. 2014: Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH.

26. Hahnel, S., et al., Investigation of Clinical and Laboratory Wear in Locator-Supported, Implant-Retained Overdentures. Int J Prosthodont, 2018. 31(4): p. 334-337.

27. Engelhardt, F., et al., Prosthetic Complications and Maintenance Requirements in Locator-attached Implant-Supported Overdentures: A Retrospective Study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2016. 24(1): p. 31-5.

28. Guedat, C., et al., Clinical performance of LOCATOR(R) attachments: A retrospective study with 1-8 years of follow-up. Clin Exp Dent Res, 2018. 4(4): p. 132-145.

29. Wang, F., et al., Maxillary Four Implant-retained Overdentures via Locator(R) Attachment: Intermediate-term Results from a Retrospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016. 18(3): p. 571-9.

30. Passia, N., M. Ghazal, and M. Kern, Long-term retention behaviour of resin matrix attachment systems for overdentures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2016. 57: p. 88-94.

31. Choi, J.W., et al., Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018. 33(5): p. 1079-1088.

32. Rinke, S., et al., Implant-supported overdentures with different bar designs: A retrospective evaluation after 5-19 years of clinical function. J Adv Prosthodont, 2015. 7(4): p. 338-43.

33. Park, J.H., S.W. Shin, and J.Y. Lee, Bar versus ball attachments for maxillary four-implant retained overdentures: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019. 30(11): p. 1076-1084.

34. Brandt, S., et al., Locator(R) versus ceramic/electroplated double-crown attachments: a prospective study on the intraindividual comparison of implant-supported mandibular prostheses. Clin Oral Investig, 2019. 23(2): p. 763-770.

35. Steinmassl, O., et al., CAD/CAM produces dentures with improved fit. Clin Oral Investig, 2018. 22(8): p. 2829-2835.

36. Steinmassl, O., et al., In Vitro Analysis of the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Denture Base Resins. Materials (Basel), 2018. 11(3).

37. Steinmassl, O., et al., Influence of CAD/CAM fabrication on denture surface properties. J Oral Rehabil, 2018. 45(5): p. 406-413.

38. Murat, S., et al., In Vitro Evaluation of Adhesion of Candida albicans on CAD/CAM PMMA-Based Polymers. J Prosthodont, 2019. 28(2): p. e873-e879.

39. Al-Fouzan, A.F., L.A. Al-Mejrad, and A.M. Albarrag, Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: A comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. J Adv Prosthodont, 2017. 9(5): p. 402-408.

40. Yang, Y., et al., Digital Duplication and 3D Printing for Implant Overdenture Fabrication. J Prosthodont, 2020.

41. An, X., et al., Digital workflow for fabricating an overdenture by using an implant surgical template and intraoral scanner. J Prosthet Dent, 2020. 123(5): p. 675-679.

42. Clark, W.A., I. Duqum, and B.J. Kowalski, The digitally replicated denture technique: A case report. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2019. 31(1): p. 20-25.

43. Schmidt, M.B., et al., Combination of Digital and Conventional Workflows in the CAD/CAM-Fabrication of an Implant-Supported Overdenture. Materials (Basel), 2020. 13(17)