Heft 1/2-2020:
Sie brauchen einen Intraoralscanner? Die Universität München hilft bei der Auswahl: Vor dem Hintergrund wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse erhalten Sie konkrete praxisrelevante Hinweise für Ihre Anschaffung, so z. B. was für die Variante Laptop oder Cart spricht oder wodurch sich Softwaretools unterscheiden.

Hier die Autoren-Info und die Literaturliste dazu.

Hier ist die Autoren-Info zum Beitrag im Heft:

Dr. Christine Keul
Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Goethestr. 70, 80336 München
Telefon+49 (0) 89 4400 59571

PD Dr. med. dent. Christine Ursula Keul, M.Sc.


1. Miyazaki, T., et al., A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J, 2009. 28(1): p. 44-56.

2. Schoenbaum, T.R., Dentistry in the digital age: an update. Dent Today, 2012. 31(2): p. 108, 110, 112-3.

3. Beuer, F., J. Schweiger, and D. Edelhoff, Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J, 2008. 204(9): p. 505-11.

4. Stevens, D.R., et al., Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006. 129(6): p. 794-803.

5. Al Mortadi, N., et al., CAD/CAM/AM applications in the manufacture of dental appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012. 142(5): p. 727-33.

6. Hajeer, M.Y., et al., Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II. J Orthod, 2004. 31(2): p. 154-62.

7. Kurbad, A., Impression-free production techniques. Int J Comput Dent, 2011. 14(1): p. 59-66.

8. Persson, A.S., et al., Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater, 2009. 25(7): p. 929-36.

9. Runkel, C., et al., Digital impressions in dentistry-accuracy of impression digitalisation by desktop scanners. Clin Oral Investig, 2019.

10. Keul, C. and J.F. Guth, Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig, 2019.

11. Boldt, F., et al., Comparison of the spatial landmark scatter of various 3D digitalization methods. J Orofac Orthop, 2009. 70(3): p. 247-63.

12. Sjogren, A.P., J.E. Lindgren, and J.A. Huggare, Orthodontic study cast analysis–reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements. J Digit Imaging, 2010. 23(4): p. 482-92.

13. Dalstra, M. and B. Melsen, From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod, 2009. 36(1): p. 36-41; discussion 14.

14. Chandran, D.T., et al., Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination. Biomed Mater Eng, 2010. 20(5): p. 243-9.

15. Luthardt, R.G., et al., Comparison of the three-dimensional correctness of impression techniques: a randomized controlled trial. Quintessence Int, 2010. 41(10): p. 845-53.

16. Endo, T. and W.J. Finger, Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int, 2006. 37(1): p. 47-51.

17. Thongthammachat, S., et al., Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont, 2002. 11(2): p. 98-108.

18. Breault, L.G., et al., Die stone disinfection: incorporation of sodium hypochlorite. J Prosthodont, 1998. 7(1): p. 13-6.

19. Al-Bakri, I.A., D. Hussey, and W.M. Al-Omari, The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials. J Clin Dent, 2007. 18(2): p. 29-33.

20. Kachalia, P.R. and M.J. Geissberger, Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc, 2010. 38(5): p. 323-30.

21. Joda, T. and U. Bragger, Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016. 27(11): p. 1401-1406.

22. Rehmann, P., V. Sichwardt, and B. Wostmann, Intraoral Scanning Systems: Need for Maintenance. Int J Prosthodont, 2017. 30(1): p. 27-29.

23. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results – Part 1: General principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:1994)

24. Revilla-Leon, M., et al., Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. J Prosthodont, 2019.

25. Arakida, T., et al., Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2018. 62(3): p. 324-329.

26. Guth, J.F., et al., Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig, 2013. 17(4): p. 1201-8.

27. Guth, J.F., et al., Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig, 2017. 21(5): p. 1445-1455.

28. Keul, C., et al., Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization–a laboratory study. Dent Mater, 2014. 30(4): p. 400-7.

29. Ender, A., et al., In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig, 2016. 20(7): p. 1495-504.

30. Zimmermann, M., A. Ender, and A. Mehl, Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro. J Am Dent Assoc, 2019.

31. Ender, A., M. Zimmermann, and A. Mehl, Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent, 2019. 22(1): p. 11-19.

32. Haddadi, Y., G. Bahrami, and F. Isidor, Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig, 2019. 23(11): p. 4043-4050.

33. Di Fiore, A., et al., Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res, 2019. 63(4): p. 396-403.

34. Muallah, J., et al., Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: an in vitro study using a new method of evaluation. Int J Comput Dent, 2017. 20(2): p. 151-164.

35. Nowak, R., et al., An in-vitro study comparing the accuracy of ?full-arch casts digitized with desktop scanners. Quintessence Int, 2017: p. 667-676.

36. Guth, J.F., et al., A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig, 2016. 20(7): p. 1487-94.